cheating forgery law legal cases Secrets
cheating forgery law legal cases Secrets
Blog Article
refers to some landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan in 2012. Below’s a brief overview:
In other circumstances as discussed supra pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on account of criminal charges after the retirement of two years; and, is violative of your regulation laid down from the Supreme Court during the case of Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon, PLD 2007 SC 35. As a result, the competent authority from the parent department in the petitioner and the Chief Secretary, Sindh, are liable to release the pensionary amount of your petitioner and fork out the pension amount and other ancillary benefits to your petitioner to which he is entitled under the regulation within two months from the date of receipt of this order. The competent authority from the respondent is additionally directed to recalculate the pensionary benefits of your petitioner and increases accrued thereon the withheld pensionary benefits with effect from stopping to date. Read more
This Court may perhaps interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in the way inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding arrived at because of the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If your conclusion or finding is including no reasonable person would have ever achieved, the Court could interfere with the summary or the finding and mould the relief to really make it ideal into the facts of each and every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority will be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-value the evidence or the nature of punishment. Around the aforesaid proposition, we're fortified by the decision of the Supreme Court within the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 252 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
twelve. There is no denial from the fact that in Government service it is predicted that the persons possessing their character earlier mentioned board, free from any moral stigma, are to become inducted. Verification of character and antecedents can be a condition precedent for appointment to the Government service. The candidates must have good character and provide two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above mentioned is that the only impediment to being appointed to the Government service is the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a means out or guise to accomplish absent with the candidature on the petitioner. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 133 Order Date: 15-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Amir Abdul Majid, 2021 SCMR 420. twelve. There is no denial from the fact that in Government service it is expected that the persons owning their character earlier mentioned board, free from any moral stigma, are for being inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is actually a condition precedent for appointment check here to some Government service. The candidates must have good character and supply two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above is that the only impediment to being appointed to some Government service is the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a method out or guise to do absent with the candidature from the petitioner. Read more
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming into the main case, it is also a very well-established proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence in the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty in the charge, however, that is issue on the procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to reach at its independent findings on the evidence.
148 . Const. P. 8180/2019 (D.B.) Saif Shujaat and Ors V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Given the legal analysis on the subject issue, we have been in the view that the claim of your petitioners for retroactive regularization from their Preliminary contract appointment and promotion thereon, from that angle isn't legally audio, Other than promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They may be issue to rules and regulations When the recruitment rules of the topic post allow the case on the petitioners for promotion may be deemed, however, we have been clear within our point of view that contractual service cannot be considered for seniority and promotion because the seniority is reckoned from the date of regular appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum fitness, subject to availability of vacancy topic to your approval of the competent authority. Read more
Upholding Justice: The application in the regulation and also the subsequent punishment on the guilty party give a sense of closure and justice to the victim’s family and loved kinds.
9. Needless to mention that any observations made in the above order are tentative in nature and shall not influence the trial Court.
Although several websites offer free case regulation, not all are equally reliable. It’s important to evaluate the credibility of your source before depending on the information.
The DCFS social worker in charge from the boy’s case had the boy made a ward of DCFS, and in her six-month report to the court, the worker elaborated about the boy’s sexual abuse history, and stated that she planned to maneuver him from a facility into a “more homelike setting.” The court approved her plan.
She did note that the boy still needed extensive therapy in order to cope with his abusive past, and “to get to the point of being safe with other children.” The boy was getting counseling with a DCFS therapist. Again, the court approved on the actions.
13309-B of 2010 to be weak types of evidence plus the evidentiary value whereof would be observed in the time in the trial. The investigation of this case has already been finalized and, Hence, confirmed custody on the petitioner in jail is not going to provide any advantageous purpose at this stage.”
While the death penalty is irreversible, life imprisonment allows for your possibility of reconsideration or commutation on the sentence in certain circumstances.